Continue reading at the original source →
Not even a hill worth debating (Lunn and the ending of Mark)
There is a popular post booming on social media that summarizes a book by Nicholas P. Lunn. Lunn argues the current ending of Mark (everything after 16:8) really is original to Mark (against the clear scholarly consensus) and that the … Continue reading 
Continue reading at the original source →
Continue reading at the original source →