Lloyd Newell ended his role as narrator of Music & the Spoken Word with the Tabernacle Choir at Temple Square. In a KSL article it says:

Throughout his time as the narrator for "Music & the Spoken Word," Newell said although he pulled inspiration from his own life, he has not used the words "I" or "me." He will, however, on Sunday as he gives his final broadcast.

It’s astonishing that Newell would specifically avoid invoking himself in his official responsibilities as narrator. It’s also clear that it was a conscious choice to do so, for 34 years! He doesn’t clarify exactly why.

I am guessing here. You can decide if you agree.

It's evident that much of what gets said in Church these days revolves around "I" and "me" rather than Jesus Christ. It's getting worse rather than better, at least at the local level.

This is what I call the "Gospel of Me."

Why are we invoking ourselves so much in lessons and talks if we are supposed to be teaching the gospel? It boggles the mind.

Elder Rasband's first talk in General Conference was indicative of this but he's gotten a lot better. See the addendum below for my analysis of it.

Spiritual Vaunting

Newell avoided what I call, Spiritual Vaunting. This is an extensive series evaluating this whole problem. An additional posting entitled, Stop Making it About You. It's Not About You develops it further.

Our current society encourages a preoccupation with self. It is hard to escape its influence. 2 Timothy 3:1-5 states:

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

Church members can’t expect to escape all these influences. We’re all susceptible.

Talks and Lessons

The tendency to invoke ourselves constantly is most evident in talks and lessons. We have a captive audience and they are instructed to listen to us. This should make us vigilant in avoiding this problem.

Okay, I’m invoking myself now here but I believe it is an important point. When I prepare a talk I often have considerable time to do so. I go over the talks numerous times and try and listen to what the Spirit is telling me.

Frequently, I’m prompted to remove passages, comments, and stories. As I’ve reflected on this, I’m confident in stating that most of what I’m prompted to remove is just stuff about me. It’s not doctrine, it doesn’t need to be there.

Consider whether you are prone to this problem as well. Consider how often you use “I” or “me” in your talks and lessons. Ask yourselves if those references should be there.

If prompted, remove them. You’ll feel better for having followed the Spirit.

Disputations

One other problem this could solve is the pesky problem of “disputations.” Scriptures mention disputations among members and Jesus Christ instructed that disputation shouldn’t happen among us (3 Nephi 11:22). What was He referring to exactly?

One possibility is that in invoking ourselves constantly, we are sharing our ideas and interpretations. If someone takes issue with us, most people will interpret this as an attack on “self.” People generally bristle and attack back. That’s the “natural man” at work.

Doctrinal discussions can be solved, or at least put to rest, by appealing directly to scripture. People don’t have their ego wrapped up in scripture. They won’t view something as an attack on their “self” if they are simply discussing doctrine.

Consider this example:

You could appeal directly to scripture and quote it but people are too prone to invoke themselves instead.

Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; 

Instead, we are more prone to say something like the following: 

I think you should try and love your enemies, treat them well and pray for them even if they are nasty or persecute you.

If someone challenges your statement, you will feel attacked and will probably attack back.

It's better to just focus on scripture, doctrine, and inspired counsel and invoke that, instead of yourself.

Conclusion

Being aware of a problem and that it IS a problem is the first step toward solving it. Be careful how much you invoke yourself by assessing how often you are using “I” and “me” in a church setting, especially when speaking or teaching.

Bearing your testimony? Well, that’s a different case entirely.


Addendum

When Elder Ronald E. Rasband was called to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, his initial talk really bothered me.

It was too much "I" and "me" (personal aggrandizement) and name-dropping/flattery. He only bears a short testimony at the end.

I Stand All Amazed
By Elder Ronald A. Rasband
Of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles

My testimony of Jesus Christ has been built from many special experiences in which I have come to know His great love for each one of us.

My dear brothers and sisters throughout the world, I’m very grateful to the First Presidency for inviting me to share my humble testimony this Sabbath day. The words of a favorite Latter-day Saint hymn describe my current feelings:

I stand all amazed at the love Jesus offers me,

Confused at the grace that so fully he proffers me. …I marvel that he would descend from his throne divine

To rescue a soul so rebellious and proud as mine,
That he should extend his great love unto such as I,

Sufficient to own, to redeem, and to justify. …
Oh, it is wonderful, wonderful to me!1

A few days ago I had the great privilege to meet with the First Presidency and receive this call from our dear prophet, President Thomas S. Monson. I want to witness to all of you of the strength and love President Monson had as he said to me, “This call comes from the Lord Jesus Christ.”

I am overwhelmed and shaken to my very core to consider the import and significance of those words so tenderly spoken by our loving prophet. President Monson, President Eyring, President Uchtdorf, I love you and will serve the Lord and you with all of my heart, might, mind, and strength.

Oh, how I have loved President Boyd K. Packer and Elders L. Tom Perry and Richard G. Scott. I dearly miss them. I am blessed to have been trained and taught at the feet of these dear Brethren. Not in the smallest part am I able to walk in their shoes, yet I am honored to stand tall on their shoulders and carry on in the Lord’s ministry.

When I think of those who have helped make me who I am, I think first of my sweet and selfless eternal companion, Melanie. Through the years, she has helped mold me like potter’s clay into a more polished disciple of Jesus Christ. Her love and support, and that of our 5 children, their spouses, and our 24 grandchildren, sustain me. To my dear family, I love you.

Like Nephi of old, I was born of goodly parents in the gospel and they of goodly parents back six generations. My earliest ancestors who joined the Church were from England and Denmark. These early pioneers gave their all to the gospel of Jesus Christ and leave a legacy for their posterity to follow. I am so grateful for a multigenerational Latter-day Saint family, and I know this is a worthy goal for all of us to strive for.

Many others have contributed to preparing my life for this new call. They include my childhood friends and family, early leaders, teachers, and lifelong mentors. I must include those from my early mission to the eastern states and our beloved missionaries from the New York New York North Mission. For the many who have influenced and shaped my life, I am most grateful.

I have cherished serving with my Brethren of the Seventy. For 15 years I have been in one of the greatest quorums and loving brotherhoods of the Church. Thank you, my dear fellow servants. Now I look forward to belonging to a new quorum. President Russell M. Nelson, my love is deep for you and each member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles.

Sister Rasband and I have been blessed to visit members during many assignments in congregations and missions around the world. We love the Latter-day Saints everywhere! Your faith has increased our faith; your testimonies have added to our testimony.

Now, if I could leave one small message with you today, it would be this: the Lord has said, “Love one another; as I have loved you.”2 I’m confident that there is no choice, sin, or mistake that you or anyone else can make that will change His love for you or for them. That does not mean He excuses or condones sinful conduct—I’m sure He does not—but it does mean we are to reach out to our fellowman in love to invite, persuade, serve, and rescue. Jesus Christ looked past people’s ethnicity, rank, and circumstances in order to teach them this profound truth.

I have been asked many times when I received my testimony.

I can’t remember not believing in Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ. I have loved Them since I learned of Them at the knees of my angel mother, reading scripture and gospel stories. That early belief has now grown into a knowledge and a witness of a loving Heavenly Father, who hears and answers our prayers. My testimony of Jesus Christ has been built from many special experiences in which I have come to know His great love for each one of us.

I’m grateful for our Savior’s Atonement and wish like Alma to shout it with the trump of God.3 I know that Joseph Smith is God’s prophet of the Restoration and that the Book of Mormon is the word of God. And I know that President Thomas S. Monson is God’s true servant and prophet on the earth today.

As we follow our prophet, I pray that we may have charity in our hearts toward others and that we will become a living witness and indeed “stand all amazed at the love Jesus offers [us].” Oh, may it be “wonderful, wonderful to [you and to] me.” In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

Some of this can be excused but taken as a whole, I think it is excessive.

I don't have any idea what his motives or intentions are. They could be 100 percent pure. He could be accurate, sincere, and telling the absolute truth.

What I know is that I could not deliver this talk without being guilty of flattery and self-aggrandizement myself. However, that doesn't mean he's guilty of it.

The knowledge and intent of the person speaking is known only to himself/herself and Heavenly Father.

What effect did it have on his hearers, those he referred to? No one knows. No one can know.

Continue reading at the original source →